- This topic has 40 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years, 9 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
forgot to mention that the 3d lut created shows no diffrence in viewer and scopes in resolve.today updated to resolve studio 16 beta 5.
You may be better off using an all output offset curve for the 3D LUT on a limited contrast display.
On the 3D LUT tab, set output offset to 100%. No need re-run measurements, just create another 3D LUT using the existing profile (disable “Create 3D LUT after profiling”).
Correct, yes (this assumes the profile is installed, and thus its embedded calibration is applied by the operating system).
hi florian.i want to calibrate and profile as good as i can for the sRGB color space.
my room ambient light levels is 5 nits.
i reset my monitor to factory default and let my color munky and display to warm up.(TN panel-73% covrege of NTSC)
my settings are:
DISPLAY AND INSTRUMENT:
sRGB preset
display:benq GL2460
instrument:color munky display
mode:LCD generic
correction:downloaded from the web for the GL2450
CALIBRATION:
interactive display adjustment checkd
OBSERVER:CIE 1931 2
WHITE POINT: color temperature -6500
WHITE LEVEL: custome (120 or 100 or 80? which one is better for me considering im editing in 5 nits?)
BLACK LEVEL: as measured
TONE CURVE: custom gamma:2.4-relative.(my monitor is set to gamma 2.45 to be closest to the target.is it good?)
BLACK OUTPUT OFFSET: 100%
no ambient light level sdjustment.
CALIBRATION SPEED: high
PROFILING
PROFILE TYPE: XYZ LUT+MATRIX
PROFILE QUALITY: HIGH
TESTCHART: 1545 PATCHES
PATCH SEQUENCE: minimize display response delay
please tell me if im doing somthing wrong? probably i do.do i chose the right settings for editing photos and videos for the web?
is my ambient light levels (5 nits) are good for the target?
should i set my monitor to 120\100\80 cdm?
did the gamma i chose (2.4) for editing sRGB is a good target?
please help me.my goal is to get my monitor calibrated as good as me and him can.ive got to work with what ive got.
thanks
You should adjust the monitor luminance to a level that is comfortable for you to look at before calibration. It is not necessary to set a white level target. Calibration gamma is irrelevant in color managed applications. I would also use a lower number of patches (default 175 would be fine).
So to what gamma to set my monitor? 2.2?2.4?
My windows UI and resolve and all the rest looks washed out.So to what gamma to set my monitor? 2.2?2.4?
It is usually better to choose the one that is closer to 2.2 if several “gamma” settings are available.
My windows UI and resolve and all the rest looks washed out.
TN panels are very viewing angle dependent. That makes them unsuitable for anything color-critical.
