- This topic has 51 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 2 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
argyll: Error – rspl: rev_interp can’t handle di = 1071296905
Report bug to ArgyllCMS maillist (if it’s a bug). It’s not related to DisplayCAL, it’s related to ArgyllCMS.
.cal file seems OK (256×4, 1 input 3 outputs = 4) and I did not see something weird in base icm. I created a synth Rec709 profile with 2.2 gamma as TRC and same error.
Attach .cal in maillist and say that you want to attach that grey calibration to a sRGB/Rec709 simple matrix profile with 2.2 gamma. Maybe there is something wrong in .cal file that I cannot locate on a fast inspection. I’m using 2.1.2
even tho now ive simply renamed files accordingly to native names as such and put those also into the bin folder>
calfile.cal
inprof.icm
and opened command window inside the bin folder , then used following command>
applycal -a calfile.cal inprof.icm outprof.icm
i get following output now >
argyll: Error – rspl: rev_interp can’t handle di = 1071296905
yeah …guess ill have to bug report apparently indeed , damn it!
p.s also got the latest x64 build version
hell ive even made a batch to make this simple one click , but yeah above error is a bitch , batch>
@echo OFF
Title Convert .cal and .icm to working usable Full .ICM Profile
::Convert .cal and .icm to working usable Full .ICM Profile
cd /D “C:\extra\system tools\Argyll_V2.1.2\bin\”
applycal -a calfile.cal inprof.icm outprof.icmok getting in contact directly with dev was gold…so far hes managed to get the process fixed atleast …so now you can atlest proper convert …BUT still for some odd reason dont proper integrate .cal file into .icm output file aka its not using the .cal settings
heres the updated applycal.exe from him for yourselfes to test out
https://www.argyllcms.com/win64_V2.2.1beta_applycal.zip
applying .cal by itself per DisplayCals menu vs the output.icm …youl see the difference in calibrations aka .cal not proper integrated into output.icm
It looks that is does not work that way. It changed TRC, not VCGT. It was meant fro printers! My fault.
Reading latest doc:NOTE that things like the white point, black point tag, gamut tag etc. are not adjusted to account for the calibration, nor does applycal read, add or change any ‘vcgt’ tag (If a ‘vcgt’ tag is present and a calibration applied as well, then both will be in effect when such a profile is installed using typical display installation tools.)
Diving into maillist:
Post by Stephen T
dispcal (which is all I want). Is it possible to insert the vcgt tag into any profile (sRGB
profile in my case)? How?Reply:
Not directly using Argyll. You could do it indirectly by creating an sRGB profile. You could
do this by creating a synthetic set of test points (say 5000-10000), use fakeread with
the sRGB profile to create the profile data, add the calibration curve table to the
data, and then create the profile using colprof. I’m not sure if that’s any easier
than what you are currently doing though !+
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/a-tool-to-embed-vcgt-tag-in-icc-profile.1771146/post-29311625
If you have a colorimeter using matrix+singlecurve + BPC and simplest 34 patch set will be the shortest way.
https://www.avsforum.com/threads/a-tool-to-embed-vcgt-tag-in-icc-profile.1771146/post-29311625
well , cant find what hes been instructing
also no color meter , i want my own hand tweaked synth .cal files vcgt added into .icm properly
He is saying that what you want won’t be included in DisplayCAL because users can mess with it and unless useed carefully obtain/forge inaccurate profiles.
As alternative he suggest to load grey calibration and then “profile only” display, but that needs a colorimeter.Maybe with a lot of effort you can forge/fake expected sRGB readings (in a synthetic way, like matlab or argylls icclu/xicclu) for 34 patch bassic matrix profile and make a .ti3, then feed it into DisplayCAL in File/create profile from measurement data.
In the same thread other vendors suggest they paid apps for what you want.
