Home › Forums › Help and Support › Reached EOF Error Win10 20H2
- This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 months ago by
Martin Winkelmann.
-
AuthorPosts
-
2022-10-25 at 4:22 #37441
Hi all, I am running into an error with Colormunki Display on Windows 10 20H2. X-Rite Devices Service Manager is not running, and Argyll_V2.3.1 is installed/binaries exist–please find the log attached below (and also attached):
19:13:41,763 Calibrate & profile 19:13:42,466 Detecting output levels range... 19:13:42,466 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19:13:42,466 Session log: 0_16 19:13:42,466 19:13:42,466 Working directory: 19:13:42,466 c:\ 19:13:42,466 users\ 19:13:42,466 blue\ 19:13:42,466 appdata\ 19:13:42,466 local\ 19:13:42,466 temp\ 19:13:42,466 DisplayCAL-gmjjeg\ 19:13:42,466 19:13:42,466 Command line: 19:13:42,466 C:\Users\blue\Downloads\Argyll_V2.3.1_win64_exe\Argyll_V2.3.1\bin\dispread.exe 19:13:42,466 -v 19:13:42,466 -k 19:13:42,466 C:\Users\blue\Downloads\DisplayCAL-3.8.9.3-win32\DisplayCAL-3.8.9.3\linear.c 19:13:42,466 al 19:13:42,466 -d1 19:13:42,466 -c1 19:13:42,466 -yn 19:13:42,466 "-P0.5,0.5,50.0" 19:13:42,466 0_16 19:13:42,466 19:13:42,801 DisplayCAL: Starting interaction with subprocess 19:13:42,801 Number of patches = 3 19:13:42,801 Setting up the instrument 19:13:43,644 Product Name: Colormunki Display 19:13:43,644 Serial Number:
redacted19:13:43,644 Firmware Version: v1.03 19:13:43,644 Firmware Date: 05Jun12 19:13:44,301 DisplayCAL: Reached EOF (OK) 19:13:44,301 dispread exitcode: -1073741819 19:13:44,301 ...aborted.Attachments:
You must be logged in to view attached files.Calibrite Display SL on Amazon
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.2022-11-02 at 23:51 #37538Hi,
I am seeing the same issue on Windows 11 22H2, did you mean that by any chance (mistyped 22 -> 20?).
Worked fine just a couple days ago before I reinstalled Windows for 22H2. The version numbers for DisplayCal and ArgyllCMS are identical.
2022-11-03 at 3:57 #37540Update: I haven’t gotten around to doing a full calibration yet but it seems like using the x86/32bit version of ArgyllCMS works!
2022-11-07 at 17:06 #37627Final Update: I got in touch with Graeme Gill, the ArgyllCMS developer. The “2.3.1b” build was created in a newer build environment, the issue is most likely that DisplayCAL can’t properly communicate with these ArgyllCMS builds, possibly due to a change in the used stdio library. There is a new build out now “2.3.1d” (same download link as the other “2.3.1” versions), which should work with DisplayCAL again. I ran a calibration with my I1D3 and everything worked as expected.
-
This reply was modified 10 months, 3 weeks ago by
Martin Winkelmann.
2022-11-07 at 18:30 #37633Where can I find that version?
If I download latest win64 executables:
Version 2.3.1b 20th October 2022
————-* MSWindows fix release for SpyderX
2022-11-07 at 23:12 #37642The update hasn’t been documented (yet?), if you download it now you should get the fixed version.
Do you have any issues when using the currently available version?
2022-11-08 at 0:25 #37644I had no issues with 2.3.1 without letter, 22H2 19045.2193, i1d3 & i1Pro2 (with 2.1.2 USB driver for i1Pro2, last one signed by DisplayCAL)
-
This reply was modified 10 months, 3 weeks ago by
Vincent.
2022-11-30 at 1:37 #37931I had no issues with 2.3.1 without letter, 22H2 19045.2193, i1d3 & i1Pro2 (with 2.1.2 USB driver for i1Pro2, last one signed by DisplayCAL)
The a/b/c/d versions silently replaced the file downloaded from the website, and only b got an entry in the changelog for the SpyderX fix.
SHA256 Checksum of 64bit 2.3.1a/no letter .zip file
dc6b8da23acd675c45a610738be207c856a8d42d99f923967f67b153f243310c
Checksum for 64bit 2.3.1d:
4c5d8be37b2656f5ae92cb2612b029bc15b030c40e59a6e3b58657852d998a3f
The change date of the files of the original 2.3.1 should be
2022-06-28
, for 2.3.1d it’s2022-11-04
(both UTC).The first 2.3.1 version works, the 64bit 2.3.1 b and c builds had the issue, the 2.3.1 d build works fine again. The 32bit versions may have never had the issue.
For anyone finding this thread, if you download ArgyllCMS right now, you should be getting a version that works with DisplayCAL.
I also want to reiterate that ArgylCMS itself always worked, it’s just that DisplayCAL wasn’t compatible with some builds; just want to make sure no one thinks that this was a QA problem on ArgyllCMS’s side.
-
This reply was modified 10 months ago by
Martin Winkelmann.
-
This reply was modified 10 months ago by
Martin Winkelmann.
-
This reply was modified 10 months, 3 weeks ago by
-
AuthorPosts