-
AnonymousInactive
Hi,
After calibration, using “report on a calibrated device” shows a gamma of 2.15. Should it be closer to 2.2, since that’s what I used for the tone curve?
My uncalibrated gamma is 2.3, but I assumed it would be better to keep using 2.2.
Profile is attached
Go to the verification tab and run a full report. The average gamma via “report on calibrated device” only takes into account the 1D calibration.
AnonymousInactive
Hi,
I have included the full report done after calibration.
On the gamma curve, the measured gamma is always lower than nominal.
There is also a gamma average of 1.13 (1.15 median) when showing additional statistics.
Given my low knowledge into this, I am assuming that the reported gamma value is wrong. However, if I’m wrong, let me know.
Thanks for the reply,
AnonymousInactive
In addition, since I’m using a TN display, I am assuming that the big “NOT OK” for Maximum ΔE*00 is normal, since it cannot reach true black.
It looks like the display has drifted a bit since it was calibrated & profiled, but still seems ok.
I am assuming that the big “NOT OK” for Maximum ΔE*00 is normal, since it cannot reach true black.
Yes, this is normal for displays with poor black level and/or poor black neutrality (you can correct for the latter using calibration black hue correction, at the expense of contrast). In your case since you are aiming for a very warm whitepoint, the effect is exacerbated.
AnonymousInactive
I ran the verification just after calibration.
Calibration was on 17th, 16h29. Verification was at 21h the same day
It’s not the best screen for colour accuracy, but still…
Display Calibration and Characterization powered by ArgyllCMS