Laptop with BOE0a59/nv1645 settings

Home Forums Help and Support Laptop with BOE0a59/nv1645 settings

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #144923

    Avrohom Yosef Gross
    Participant
    • Offline

    I have a dell 7620 with this panel https://www.panelook.com/NV160WUM-N45_BOE_16.0_LCM_overview_52340.html And I am trying to figure out the best settings I should use for it using a spyderx pro

    Here notebookcheck has a profile https://www.notebookcheck.net/Dell-Inspiron-16-7620-2-in-1-convertible-review-Mylar-and-aluminum-chassis.628030.0.html if thats helpful.

    Should I be at wled- black point comp – white point as measured and single matrix or something else?

    Thanks.

    SpyderX Pro on Amazon  
    Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    #144924

    Vincent
    Participant
    • Offline

    69.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
    95.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
    67% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)

    It can be White LED (blue led + yellow phosphor) or W-LED PFS limited to sRGB like we see in some Benqs.
    Instead of those useless calman repsots reviews should plot display Spectral power distribution, since as a review, it is meant to help users to make decisions.
    It’s even worse since they were using an i1Pro2 and there is a SPD plot in Calman (last one on typical verification worlflow) they don’t care to add.

    Googling lamp model (11S6P WLED)  offers no further information so you’ll have to try between White LED / Standard LED and PFS phsophor built in modes for your Spyder X.
    White led / Standard led  has higher chances, but PFS limited to SRGB are becoming more common in mid-high grade displays

    Should I be at wled- black point comp – white point as measured and single matrix or something else?

    White is too off towards green, you should be able to notice it visually and contrast is very high, so I’ll aim to D65 whitepoint and let VCGT correct it (6dE is “small correction” regarding VCGT) since you have no access to RGB Gains on a laptop. The loss of unique grey levels and contrast due to WP correction seems small to me.

    Then single curve matrix profile with BPC as you suggested.

    • This reply was modified 7 months, 1 week ago by Vincent.
    #144926

    Avrohom Yosef Gross
    Participant
    • Offline

    Here is my white vs my pfs at 85 percent brightness by eye the pfs is much redder and the white is much greener.

    Attachments:
    You must be logged in to view attached files.
    #144932

    Vincent
    Participant
    • Offline

    Without an spectrophotometer or review… it’s guessing (although it may be an educated guess based on known panels).
    Choose the visually whiter or if this is not enough, visual whitepoint editor.

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Log in or Register

Display Calibration and Characterization powered by ArgyllCMS