it’s worth to use this profile?

[warrior94 SourceForge]

Hi,
I’ve tried to calibrate my laptop screen with dispcal and my spyder 4 express device, I’ve used the laptop preset but i am getting hi-value errors, so i was wondering, is still worth to use this profile/calibration or should I go back to windows defaults?

Thanks for the support, Matteo.

Link with verification, profile and log files: https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BzegrzqIDWFicF9ONWl3dGFvYVE&usp=sharing

[Florian Höch]

Hi,

I’ve used the laptop preset

Are you sure? The “Laptop” preset should create a XYZ LUT profile, but your profile is a simple curves + matrix one, which may explain the bad result (panels from laptops are sometimes not very well behaved and thus better characterized by a LUT profile).

[warrior94 SourceForge]

Hi Florian, thanks for the support.
Yes I’ve used the Laptop preset, the only parameters I’ve changed were the ammount of patches in the profiling section (switched to 97 patches with auto-optimized testchart because the default process takes too much time [2 hours]) and the calibration speed (veryhigh) .

[warrior94 SourceForge]

Problem Solved, using a lut profile errors are acceptable, thanks for the support!!

[Author]

Posts