- This topic has 37 replies, 10 voices, and was last updated 5 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
How is the speed compared to 2.3.1?
for 1000 patches, 3.0.2 is about same as 2.3.1
And above 1000 patches?
Hi,
I’ve got the same problem, with Argyll 3.0.2, I had to install a 32bits on a 64bits system. The calibration speed now is around 2x slower than with 2.3.1 .
My colorimeter is a Colorchecker Display .
Calibrite Display SL on Amazon
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.After resolving the issues with the Logitech LampArray Service, which was preventing ArgyllCMS from communicating with my i1Display3 (NEC-branded ColorMunki), I can confirm that, from what I’ve seen, ArgyllCMS v3.3.0 (the latest version) is about twice as slow as v2.3.1 when it comes to DisplayCAL calibration and profiling.
In my case, with “Calibration speed: High” and “Amount of patches: 175 (Auto-optimized),” it took 20 minutes vs. 11 minutes on the older version.
Hi,
I’ve got the same problem, with Argyll 3.0.2, I had to install a 32bits on a 64bits system. The calibration speed now is around 2x slower than with 2.3.1 .
My colorimeter is a Colorchecker Display .
do you mean that it was 2x slower with 64bit, but 32 works fine or that you have an issue with 64bit, installed 32 bit, bit it’s slower.
Was just wondering if I should use 32bit as I have been using 64bit without issues, but the time difference between estimated and actual is pretty big (medium cal speed. and 2600 patches, CC DisplayPlus, W11). Thanks
