- This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 8 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
dont know if this has been mentioned before, its widely acknowledged that the community correction database has a lot of “fake” or useless profiles. It would be helpful if users can rate or comment on each files
That would mean a lot of extra work for the dev, deleting bot content and such. Let’s say a correction uses the full native gamut of the display, as it should. A five star rating wont mean anything if the user set his display to sRGB emulation. As generic correction might be better due to higher resolution.
You can always start a thread on the forum, knowledgeable users will gladly assist with choosing the best correction.
As an easy rule => channels look like a combinatioon of other channels => discard. YOu can plot CCSS with DIsplayCAK or with specplot.exe in argyllcms folder.
It’s easy to see typical scenarios where p3-adobergb green or p3 red has additional peaks on other channels.
