sRGB or 2.2 for casual use?

Home Forums General Discussion sRGB or 2.2 for casual use?

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #39248

    David C
    Participant
    • Offline

    I am aware sRGB tracks 2.2 for the important mid-tones and this is only really an issue related to the darkest colors.

    It’s hard to know what content creators are really doing, but I do know:

    • Engineers are being schooled to assume sRGB when converting color spaces or adjusting the results of linear light calculations, (i.e. in generating 3D images).
    • Video drives can use sRGB buffers for linear light blending in games, (though I can only assume they’re accurately using sRGB and not just 2.2 for performance).

    I also know:

    • Artists and content creators are being taught to calibrate their monitors to 2.2. This is the standard advice I see all over the internet.
    • I believe 2.2 is standard for Mac which is popular with content creators.

    So if I have a monitor with good bit-depth and contrast ratio that can be calibrated pretty well in the darks, which should I choose for the best experience? If I use sRGB won’t I see washed out darks in content that was perfected  by someone using a 2.2 calibration? If I use 2.2 won’t I get crushed darks in content that was perfected using sRGB?

    #39250

    Vincent
    Participant
    • Offline

     

    • I believe 2.2 is standard for Mac which is popular with content creators.

    And maybe macOS fakes profile TRC vs actual TRC => iMac may be 2.2, ICC TRC reports a fake TRC non 2.2

    This will add some “noise”/”unmatching” between apps, like sRGB content non color managed in CAD/CAM             vs         sRGB encoded and tagged content in Photoshop on a 2.2 display with a display profile TRC matching that 2.2
    Also common IPS displays calibrated to 2.2 and accurately  profiled will reflect the bending of actual TRC due to limited contrast.

    I would say 2.2, profile matching TRC accurately by keep BPC. If non color managed TRC mismatch bothers you (CAD/CAM) then you can add a DMWLUT layer for such task.

    #39252

    David C
    Participant
    • Offline

    I would say 2.2, profile matching TRC accurately by keep BPC. If non color managed TRC mismatch bothers you (CAD/CAM) then you can add a DMWLUT layer for such task.

    Thanks. I wouldn’t say it “bothers” me. Am calibrating a monitor for personal, casual use and just wondered which was the best choice for non-color managed apps.

    I think I’ll just take your advice and use 2.2 and look into DMWLUT if some application actually does bother me.

    #39268

    Christytrind
    Participant
    • Offline

    look at the keybind config, i presume if you figure out what the key code is for them you can link that keycode to the sdl listener using what ever name you want.

    P.S. Massage in Dusseldorf[/url]
    Escorts Toronto – escortstoronto.top[/url]

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Log in or Register

Display Calibration and Characterization powered by ArgyllCMS